Tanto Pratondo Utomo
Program Studi Teknologi Hasil Pertanian, Universitas Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
Erdi Suroso
Program Studi Teknologi Hasil Pertanian, Universitas Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
Harun Al Rasyid
Program Studi Teknologi Hasil Pertanian, Universitas Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
Muhammad Pandutyas
Program Studi Teknologi Hasil Pertanian, Universitas Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
Adven Bangun Sihite
Program Studi Teknologi Hasil Pertanian, Universitas Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/j-agt.v10i02.5049
ABSTRACT
Performance and productivity of natural rubber agroindustry could be determined by its overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) value because OEE is the best way to monitor the production efficiency which consisted of availability ratio (AR), performance efficiency (PE), and quality rate (QR). By using the OEE, the Standard Indonesia Rubber (SIR) and Ribbed Smoked Sheet (RSS) Factory find the sources of its productivity loss. The aim of this research were to determine the OEE of RSS Rubber Factory and its source of productivity loss. This research was conducted in one SIR 3 and one RSS Factory in Lampung Province. The research was conducted by field survey. The primary and secondary data collected was analyzed descriptively and were presented in tables and diagrams. The result showed that the average OEE of SIR Factory was 71.68 percent which was consisted of 89.58 percent of AR, 80.29 percent of PE, and 99.81 percent of QR; meanwhile OEE RSS Factory was of 46.47 percent that consisted of 95.92 percent of availability ratio, 48.42 percent of performance effciency, and 99.97 percent of quality product. The performance efficiency was the lowest among three components of RSS Rubber Factory OEE. This low value of performance efficiency showed that the speed of the production process is far from predetermined or designed production speed rate.
Keywords: OEE, rubber factory, SIR 3, RSS
REFERENCES
Ahuja, I. P. S., and Khamba, J. S. 2008. Total productive maintenance: Literature review and directions. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 25 (7): 709-756.
Choubey, A. 2012. Study the initiation steps of total productive maintenance in an organisation and its affect in improvement of overall equipment efficiency. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA), pp: 2248-9622.
[Ditjenbun] Direktorat Jenderal Bina Produksi Perkebunan. 2012. Statistik Perkebunan Indonesia 2012. Ditjenbun, Jakarta.
Gasperz, V. 2009. Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) – Indikator Efektifitas TPM. http://www.esnips.com/web/GratisDariVincentGasperz. [Diakses Tanggal 24 Mei 2012].
Hasriyono M. 2009. “Evaluasi Efektivitas Mesin dengan Penerapan Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) di PT Hadi Baru”. Skripsi. Fakultas Teknik Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.
Hutagaol, H.J. 2009. “Penerapan Total Productive Maintenance untuk Peningkatan Efisiensi Produksi menggunakan Metode Overall Equipment Effectiveness di PTP Nusantara III Gunung Para”. Skripsi. Fakultas Teknik Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.
Nakajima, S. 1988. Introduction to Total Productive Maintenance. Productivity Press, Cambrige MA.