Uji Keandalan Model Sacramento pada DAS Bedadung dan DAS Kloposawit
(Reliability Test of Sacramento Model at the Bedadung and Kloposawit Watershed)
Uji Keandalan Model Sacramento pada DAS Bedadung dan DAS Kloposawit
(Reliability Test of Sacramento Model at the Bedadung and Kloposawit Watershed)
Sri Wahyuningsih
Staf Pengajar Jurusan Teknik Pertanian, Universitas Jember, Jember, Indonesia
Elida Novita
Staf Pengajar Jurusan Teknik Pertanian, Universitas Jember, Jember, Indonesia
Indarto
Staf Pengajar Jurusan Teknik Pertanian, Universitas Jember, Jember, Indonesia
DOI:
ABSTRACT
Sacramento model is once of rainfall runoff Library (RRL) model which used to measure the flow components that include rainfall, evaporation and discharge. Sacramento model using soil moisture measurements to simulate the water balance at the catchment area. Sacramento model is a relatively new model so needs to be done the testing of this model. The testing process is often used for modeling is a process of calibration and validation. Aim this study is to evaluate the feasibility of the Sacramento model to be applied in the Bedadung and Kloposawit watershed and compare the optimal parameters the both watersheds on the basis of their characteristics. The methodology used is the calibration and validation. Calibration is done by automatic methods (generic) and the method of trial and error (manually) while the method for validating is simple-sample test. The results showed that the Sacramento model proper to applied in the Bedadung and Kloposawit watershed. This is indicated by the Nash coefficient, the coefficient of correlation and bias. By using generic methods on Bedadung watershed available the Nash coefficient value of 0.849, the correlation coefficient for 0.993 and bias of 8.11. Meanwhile, if using manual methods will be obtained the Nash coefficient for 0.906 and correlation coefficient equal to 0.997. While the generic calibration method in the Kloposawit watershed available the Nash coefficient values obtained for 0,894, the correlation coefficient for 0.967 and bias of 11.11. Meanwhile, if using manual methods will be obtained for Nash coefficient is 0.918 and correlation coefficient equal to 0968. The method of validation model with a simple -sample test. The result of validation for Klopo sawit watershed is the Nash coefficient value of 0.913 and the correlation coefficient for 0.989. While the Bedadung watershed is the Nash coefficient value of 0.860, the correlation coefficient for 0.991.
Keywords: sacramento, calibration, validation, simple-sample test, nash coefficient
REFERENCES
Anonim (2002). Evaluasi Banjir DPS Sampean Kabupaten Situbondo dan Bondowoso, Laporan Akhir, Jember: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Jember.
Anonim (2002). Evaluasi Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Air Satuan Wilayah Sungai (SWS) Brantas. Laporan Akhir. Jember Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Jember.
Blöschl G, and Grayson R (2000). Spatial Observation and Interpolation In : R Grayson and G Blöschl (eds), Spatial Pattern in Catchment Hydrology:Observation and modelling. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. pp : 17-50.
Chow VT (1988). Open Channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York.
Dirjen Irigasi (1986). Kriteria Perencanaan (KP 01). Bagian Perencanaan Bangunan Irigasi.
Floyd C (1987). Outline of a Paradigma Change in Software Engineering. In Bjerknes, G Eha, P and Kyng M (Eds) Computers and Democracy. Avebury Aldershort UK and Brookfield, USA
Freeze RA (1974). Mathematical Models of Hillslope Hydrology. sec.6, dalam M. J. Kirkby (ed.): Hillslope Hydrology. Wiley. New York.
Harto, Sri (1983). Mengenal Dasar Hidrologi Terapan. Biro penerbit KMTS. Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta.
Linsley, et al. (1996). Hidrologi untuk Insinyur. Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta.
Martha J dan Adidarma W (1987). Mengenal Dasar-Dasar Hidrologi. Penerbit Nova, Bandung.
Poerwidodo (1991). Genesa Tanah : Batuan Pembentuk Tanah. Edisi ke satu cetakan ke satu. Rajawali Pers. Jakarta.
Podger G (2004). Rainfall Runoff Library. Department of Infrastruktur, Planning and Natural Resource. CRC for Catchment Hidrology. Australia.
Refsgaard JS (2000). Towards a Formal Approach to Calibration and Validation of Models Using Spatial Data. In : R. Grayson and G. Blöschl, (eds.) Spatial Patterns in Catchment Hydrology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, pp : 397 + index.
Seyhan E (1990). Dasar-dasar Hidrologi, Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
Soemarto (1989). Hidrologi Teknik Edisi pertama. Erlangga, Jakarta.
Soemarto (1995). Hidrologi Teknik Edisi ke-2. Erlangga, Jakarta.
Soesanto B dan Ernanda H (1991). Pengantar Hidrologi. Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Jember, Jember.
Soewarno (1991). Hidrologi Aplikasi Statistik Untuk Pengolahan Data Aliran Sungai. Penerbit Nova, Bandung.
Sosrodarsono dan Takeda K (1993). Hidrologi Untuk Pengairan. Cetakan kedelapan. PT. Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.
Sosrodarsono S dan Takeda K (1999). Hidrologi untuk Pengairan.. PT. Pradnya Paramita Pradnya, Bandung.
Sudjana (2002). Metoda Statistika. edisi keenam. Penerbit Tarsito, Bandung.
Susanto Sahid (1996). Prinsip Dasar dan Aplikasi Hidrologi. Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta.
Takeda (1993). Hidrologi Untuk Pengairan. Cetakan kedelapan. PT. Pradnya Paramita, Bandung
Todini E (1998). Rainfall-Runoff Modelling Post, Present and Future Journal of Hydrology. 100,141-352.
Wilson EM (1993). Enginering Hydrology. Mac Million and co Ltd, London.
Published
20-06-2010
Issue
Vol. 4 No. 1 2010: Jurnal Agroteknologi
Pages
41-59
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Jurnal Agroteknologi
How to Cite
Wahyuningsih, S., Novita, E., & Indarto. (2010). Uji keandalan model sacramento pada DAS Bedadung dan DAS Kloposawit. Jurnal Agroteknologi, 4(1), 41-59.